Archive for June, 2012

Flax partners with open source support specialists Sirius Corporation

We’re very happy to announce we’ve partnered with Sirius Corporation. Sirius are the leading U.K. provider of managed services, support and training for open source software with an impressive and growing list of clients including Canonical, Médecins Sans Frontières and the Met Office. We’ve recently carried out a major project for which Sirius will be providing ongoing support on a 24/7 SLA basis and we’re looking forward to further collaboration with this energetic, highly professional and skilled company.

We’re also happy to announce that Flax and Sirius will be co-hosting a free, half day event on Open Source Enterprise Search on Friday 20th July from 9.30 a.m. Held at the Sirius Corporation offices in Weybridge, Surrey, this will be an opportunity to find out how open source search can directly benefit your business. Whether you need search over documents on an intranet or database, pages on a website or more specialised applications such as media monitoring, taxonomy and classification, open source technologies can offer an economical and highly scalable route to success. The event will feature focussed briefings, networking and discussion with leading experts in the field. It’s completely free to attend and breakfast, refreshments and a riverside barbeque lunch will be provided.

You can register and find out more online.

Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Business, News

June 28th, 2012

No Comments »

Updating individual fields in Lucene with a Redis-backed codec

A customer of ours has a potential search application which requires (largely for reasons of performance) the ability to update specific individual fields of Apache Lucene documents. This is not the first time that someone has asked for this functionality. However, until now, it has been impossible to change field values in a Lucene document without re-indexing the entire document. This was due to the write-once design of Lucene index segment files, which would necessitate re-writing the entire file if a single value changes.

However, the introduction of pluggable codecs in Lucene 4.0 means that the concrete representation of index segments has been abstracted away from search functionality, and can be specified by the codec designer. The motivation for this was to make it possible to experiment with new compression schemes and other innovations, however it may also make it possible to overcome the current limitation of whole-document-only updates.

Andrzej Bialecki has proposed a “stacked update” design on top of the Lucene index format, in which changed fields are represented by “diff” documents which “overlay” the values of an existing document. If the “diff” document does not contain a certain field, then the value is taken from the original, overlaid document. This design is currently a work in progress.

Approaching the challenge independently, we have started to experiment with an alternative design, which makes a clear distinction between updatable and non-updateable fields. This is arguably a limitation, but one which may not be important in many practical applications (e.g. adding user tags to documents in a corpus). Non-updatable fields are stored using the standard Lucene codec, while updatable fields are stored externally by a codec that uses Redis, an open-source, flexible, fast key-value store. Updates to these fields could then be made directly in the Redis store using the JRedis library.

We have written a minimal, 2-day proof of concept, which can be checked out with:

svn checkout

There is still a significant amount of work to be done to make this approach robust and performant (e.g. when Lucene merges segments, the Redis document IDs will have to be remapped). At this stage we would welcome any comments and suggestions about our approach from anyone who is interested in this area of functionality.

Tags: , , , , ,

Posted in Technical

June 22nd, 2012


Clade – a freely available, open source taxonomy and autoclassification tool

One way to manage digital information is to classify it into a series of categories or a heirarchical taxonomy, and traditionally this was done manually by analysts, who would examine each new document and decide where it should fit. Building and maintaining taxonomies can also be labour intensive, as these will change over time (for a simple example, just consider how political parties change and divide, with factions appearing and disappearing). Search engine technology can be used to automate this classification process and the taxonomy information used as metadata, so that search results can be easily filtered by category, or automatically delivered to those interested in a particular area of the heirarchy.

We’ve been working on an internal project to create a simple taxonomy manager, which we’re releasing today in a pre-alpha state as open source software. Clade lets you import, create and edit taxonomies in a browser-based interface and can then automatically classify a set of documents into the heirarchy you have defined, based on their content. Each taxonomy node is defined by a set of keywords, and the system can also suggest further keywords from documents attached to each node.

This screenshot shows the main Clade UI, with the controls:

A – dropdown to select a taxonomy
B – buttons to create, rename or delete a taxonomy
C – the main taxonomy tree display
D – button to add a category
E – button to rename a category
F – button to delete a category
G – information about the selected category
H – button to add a category keyword
I – button to edit a keyword
J – button to toggle the sense of a keyword
K – button to delete a keyword
L – suggested keywords
M – button to add a suggested keyword
N – list of matching document IDs
O – list of matching document titles
P – before and after document ranks

Clade is based on Apache Solr and the Stanford Natural Language Processing tools, and is written in Python and Java. You can run it on on either Unix/Linux or Windows platforms – do try it and let us know what you think, we’re very interested in any feedback especially from those who work with and manage taxonomies. The README file details how to install and download it.

Strange bedfellows? The rise of cloud based search

Last night our US partners Lucid Imagination announced that LucidWorks, their packaged and supported version of Apache Lucene/Solr, is available on Microsoft’s Azure cloud computing service. It seems like only a few weeks since Amazon announced their own CloudSearch system and no doubt other ’search as a service’ providers are waiting in the wings (we’re going to need a new acronym as SaaS is already taken!). At first the combination of a search platform based on open source Java code with Microsoft hosting might seem strange, and it raises some interesting questions about the future of Microsoft’s own FAST Search technology – is this final proof that FAST will only ever be part of Sharepoint and never a standalone product? However with search technology becoming more and more of a commodity this is a great option for customers looking for search over relatively small numbers of documents.

Lucid’s offering is considerably more flexible and full-featured than Amazon’s, which we hear is pretty basic with a lack of standard search features like contextual snippets and a number of bugs in the client software. You can see the latter in action at Runar Buvik’s excellent OpenTestSearch website. With prices for the Lucid service ranging from free for small indexes, this is certainly an option worth considering.

Enterprise Search Europe 2012 – Big Data, search surveys and some FUD from Google

I visited Enterprise Search Europe for the first day only last week, and caught a number of the presentations as well as giving one of my own (which I won’t discuss here but you’ll hear more about over the next few weeks). First up was Paul Doscher of Lucid Imagination with a lively presentation discussing whether search is either dead or now a commodity, or whether search on Hadoop is the new killer app for the emerging world of Big Data. We then had Kristian Norling from Findwise with some initial results from their survey on enterprise search – some interesting numbers here such as ‘18.5% of users are mostly/very satisfied with search’ and only ‘6% have a search strategy although 46% are planning one’ – we hear that Kristian is hoping to make the survey an annual one, which will be a great resource for anyone in the industry.

Matt Mullen, fuelled by diet cola, gave an introduction to search with a key point – that enterprise search usually performs a role within a workflow or task – a fact often ignored. Runar Buvik of Searchdaimon talked about a great resource he has developed comparing search engines, which can give some often amusing contrasts between different technologies, with some insisting there are no results for a particular query while others find thousands. I also enjoyed Emma Bayne and Donald Phillips polished presentation on the search facilities at the National Archives – interestingly although Autonomy is currently powering their search they are considering open source alternatives.

The day concluded with a presentation from Matt Eichner of Google, who turned up with their own film crew. You can read much of what he said at Computer World. I’m afraid I didn’t enjoy this presentation very much – it talked down to the audience and contained a lot of FUD around open source (surprising when Google uses and supports so much of it) – complete with sympathy-garnering pictures of babies in incubators and silly analogies about how one should prefer to fly in the airplane that cost the most. I hadn’t realised until his talk that the Google Search Appliance appears to be made of cheese!

It was great to network and catch up, and I hope next year to be able to attend the whole event. Thanks to all the organisers especially Martin White of Intranet Focus.